CPRE Worcestershire

WORCESTERSHIRE

 

News and Events

News from the Newsletter
Select Articles from the Menu below

New Chairman Chairman's Report New Town is NOT the Best Option Regional Perspective Successful AGM at Spetchley
CPRE on Broadway Best-kept Churchyard Compitition Face Lift for the 300 Club Draw Windmills on my mind Can You Do More For Your Local Group

New Town Is Not The Best Option

With the public now being given an opportunity to comment on the Options and Issues for South Worcestershire's development, one of the options will be to build a new town, just as it was in 1997 when the old Structure Plan was under consideration.

Clearly not all CPRE members will oppose this, but we hope the majority will for the following reasons.

First, even if there were agreement on where the town would be built, it would take several years to get through the planning process and more years to build. It would probably be around 15 years before many people moved into the houses, since much infrastructure and other facilities would need to be in place frst.The days of letting people move in to a building site have gone. This is of no benefit to those waiting for low-cost houses now.

In contrast, small housing developments on brownfeld sites or located near the edge of existing towns can be approved and built in a year or less, with the occupants often able to use existing facilities such as shops, schools and public services without much further building required.

Secondly, because a new town would need to be linked to others, the impact on the countryside would be greater. Existing roads would need to be widened, some new ones built, much duplication of facilities provided, not forgetting a newTown Hall or civic centre. Eventually there would be calls for a bypass!

Thirdly, a new town would need to be located some distance from existing towns in order to provide a green space or strategic gap around it.This would change the pattern of town and countryside far more radically than just making modest extensions to existing towns and impact more strongly on the landscape.

It is, of course, a blow to those who lose their views of the countryside, as I experienced in 1995 when the farmland on the edge of Malvern known asTownsend Fields was built on, reducing our view of the countryside from 20 miles to 30 yards! In spite of this, I feel that it was a better solution to Malvern's housing needs, as within a minute or two one is again able to stroll along the leafy lanes of the Worcestershire countryside.

Frank Hill

Go to National News Releases